DILG says LGUs can't get your license, but Manila says yes we can

DILG says LGUs can't get your license, but Manila says yes we can
Another traffic management fiasco after NCAP
After the issue regarding the no-contact apprehension policy (NCAP) saw the Supreme Court step in and (partially) calm things down, another argument on the subject of traffic management is brewing.
Last week, the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) released a memorandum that reiterates the authority to confiscate driver's licenses are only given to the enforcers of the Land Transportation Office (LTO) and its deputies. However, the City of Manila is making an interesting case on the matter.

Manila Mayor Honey Lacuna's spokesperson insists Manila traffic enforcers will continue to confiscate driver's licenses of erring motorists. According to Atty. Princess Abante, they are following their local traffic ordinance. Specifically, Ordinance No. 8092 of the Manila Traffic Code which says “a duly deputized traffic enforcement officer shall confiscate the driver's license and the issued receipt shall serve as Temporary Driver's License for five (5) days from date of issuance”.

Article XXII - Procedures and Penalties under Manila Traffic Code
So why are they insisting on this? Well, the spokesperson says under the Local Government Code of the Philippines, local government units (LGUs) are empowered to regulate their own traffic as they see fit. And under their ordinances and interpretation, they can confiscate licenses despite the LTO being the only designated agency that may do so under Republic Act 4136.
If we recall, the DILGs memorandum is also directing LGUs to review their ordinances to comply with the DILG-DOTC Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC). If we get our English language right, the DILG basically wants LGUs to check their local traffic codes and align them to the aforementioned JMC.
The way it is playing out is that the City of Manila is empowered by a Republic Act (LGU Code) to craft its own traffic rules including license confiscation, but under Republic Act 4136 only the LTO and deputies may confiscate licenses. Which one should be followed? Do we need the Supreme Court to step in again?
Let us know what you think in the comments.
Related Posts

Bacoor LGU says it can confiscate driver’s licenses; LTO and DILG disagree
Conflicting rules leave motorists caught in the middle

Manila announces road closures for 2026 Lunar New Year celebrations
Plan ahead or postpone your trips to a later time if you're heading to Binondo or Intramuros

DILG to LGUs: Only LTO can confiscate driver's licenses
DILG says traffic management units of LGUs can only issue tickets

DOTr to LTO: Make it 15 working days to settle violation
The DOTr has also ordered the suspension of the confiscation of driver's licenses

Cops in viral video who claimed had mechanical issues relieved from posts
"To serve and protect"

DOE issues warning vs hoarding, profiteering amid fuel price swings
Report irregularities to the Department of Energy